But have you ever stopped and thought about how difficult that concept might be: "Christian politics?" What should "Christian politics" look like? Does it have the moral fiber and stewardship of conservatism mixed with the social awareness and compassion of liberalism? Does it mean well but ultimately die the death of a thousand qualifications? Does it confuse the kingdom of God with the kingdoms of this earth?
Christianity is by nature political. That is to say that to be Christian is to be a a part of a community of faith in practice. Persons in community must find ways of relating to one another and being together. Even further, the community of faith is in the world, and therefore must operate within the greater human community. Our faith and the practice of it together (even my private convictions) hold social ramifications. If it has to do with the organization and aggregate relationship of a social group, it is by definition political.
But Christianity is not partisan. It is not one political ideology or platform. It is not a set of ideas really. Christianity is dedication to a person--namely, Jesus. This commitment to relationship with Jesus redefines all other commitments for Christians. Furthermore, Christianity is not a government. I don't think that impersonal things like "government" can be Christian. Government is an object, not a subject--it cannot do, think, act, live, etc. like Jesus. The people (subjects) within it can, but the government as a whole cannot. We as persons live Christian-ly as we relate, interact, and coexist with others.
yup... nailed it. |
In politics--and in most areas of our lives--we want to dumb everything down to one or two soundbites or concepts so that we can make an easy decision that will cost us little in terms of investment but yield us great return and reward. Low investment, high yield... sounds like a myth to me. It seems we are begging to just know what is right (and wrong), but we lack the stomach required to learn what is true (and false). We want to know what to think more than we actually want to think about it.
Maybe it is because we know that depth is time-consuming, so we opt out because we are busy (or we say that we are busy)? Maybe we know that depth is challenging, so we opt out because life is hard enough (or we say that life is hard enough)? Maybe we know that depth requires vulnerability and the willingness to have our minds changed, so we opt out because we want to be strong and consistent (or people will think that we are strong and consistent)? Whatever the reason, our lack of depth is killing us (and our churches).
The answer is not uniformity--all of us must agree and vote this way. That sucks the life, creativity, imagination, exploration, and depth out of the gospel truth. Whatever your politics--conservative, liberal, independent, or conscientious objector--avoid the shallow all-too-easy answers and commit yourself to seeking deep answers that do your best to be as Christian as possible in all circumstances regardless of the outcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment